Sunday, January 31, 2010

Resuscitating the Revised Standard Version

Saint Benedict RSV-CE

RSV-CE by Saint Benedict Press

The Tyndale family of Bibles are the most influential in the history of English Bible translations. 90% of William Tyndale’s Bible is re-used by the King James Version. The KJV, in turn, was revised in 1885 as the Revised Version, which was again revised in 1901 as the American Standard Version, which has spawned the modern Tyndale Bibles.

One of these is the Revised Standard Version. From its inception in 1946, and especially the publication of the Old Testament in 1952, it has been attacked by Evangelicals for being theologically liberal. For instance, where the New Testament writers quote the Old Testament, the RSV do not “follow” the NT rendering, in some cases contradicting it. The most common example is Isaiah 7:14, quoted by the author of Matthew in 1:23:

Isaiah 7:14 Matthew 1:23
Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Imman'u-el.

"Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel" (which means, God with us).

For this and other reasons, the RSV has been abandoned by conservatives, who created their own revision of the ASV in 1971 called the New American Standard Bible. Liberal Christians also weren’t satisfied with the RSV, especially concerning its patriarchal language, and was replaced by the New Revised Standard Version in 1989. The RSV was revised again, by some Evangelicals, into the English Standard Version in 2001.

And so the RSV was consigned into history, abandoned and forgotten. It celebrated its 50th Anniversary in 2002 and Oxford released a special edition of the RSV, but was hardly a success. The RSV seemed to be on its last legs. Then came an unexpected reprieve.

On the other side of Christendom, the Vatican promulgated the Liturgiam Authenticam in 2001, requiring tighter rules on proper translation of liturgical texts. A consequence of this the rejection of “gender inclusive” Bible translations in Catholic liturgy. The most commonly used English Catholic Bibles (New American Bible, New Jerusalem Bible, New Revised Standard Version – Catholic Edition) have, to a lesser or greater extent, ran afoul of the Vatican, and priests and laity have looked elsewhere for an acceptable replacement.

Tranditionalists insisted that the English church return to the Douai-Rheims, an older translation from the late sixteenth century. More sober Catholics are un-persuaded and kept looking. The Catholic Church in America, who have been using the NAB, commissioned a revision of the NAB that removed “troubling” renderings, and have been using it till today. Unfortunately it is not available to the laity, who make do with the illicit NAB. A few suggested the Knox Bible, but were thankfully ignored. Non-North American Catholics traded in their NJBs for the older Jerusalem Bible. And for some Latin-American and Philippine Catholics, the Christian Community Bible or the GNB-CE is adequate.

And then there was the Ignatius Bible. Actually, it’s just a repackaged RSV-Catholic Edition with a new cover. The RSV had (with minor revisions) been previously accepted by the Catholic hierarchy in 1966, shortly after the Second Vatican Council. The RSV-CE was generally ignored by most Catholics, who either went with the newer NRSV-CE, the Catholic-produced NAB, or the NJB; but enjoyed modest sales throughout the late twentieth century.

Shortly after Liturgiam Authenticam, sales of the RSV-CE picked up. What was once denounced by conservative protestants have now been enthusiastically embraced by conservative Catholics. Sensing a good opportunity, other publishers have also started printing their own RSV-CE to break the Ignatius monopoly. Oxford University Press came out with a variety of RSV-CE bibles, while Saint Benedict Press have started a line of high quality RSV-CE’s of their own.

Some examples of changes in the RSV-CE*

Bible verse RSV RSV - CE
Matt 1:19 divorce her send her away
Luke 1:28 O favored one full of grace
Romans 9:5 Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Christ, who is God over
1 Thess 4:4 how to take a wife for himself how to control his own body

Ignatius Press upped the ante by revising the RSV-CE, removing all the archaic language, fiddling with some words to make the language more in tune with Catholic theology (cup to chalice), etc. This Second Edition of the RSV may be considered as an “ESV for Catholics” inasmuch as the ESV is a modern Evangelical (and Calvinist?) revision of the RSV.

The immediate future the RSV looks bright, at the expense of the NAB and NRSV-CE, which are bleeding readers from the LA fallout. In the long term, it’s still a bit of a mystery. When the re-revised NAB finally reaches the laity, will they change bibles again? Will a wholly new Catholic translation come out and render all current options obsolete?

For my part, as a fan of this venerable translation, I cannot help but be optimistic. Sure, I have two NRSVs and I use them more. But the RSV has an elegance that cannot be matched by any of its modern descendants (even the RSV-2CE). And with good quality RSV-CE bibles available, I look forward to buying one before it finally bites the dust.

(Note: Today is National Bible Sunday in the Philippines.)

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Reality as subordinate to Scripture

“… because Scripture participates in the rationalistic project, objective evidence, as the true representation of reality, must be understood to support the biblical claims no matter their ostensible appearance. If the evidence appears to support another position other than the literal interpretation of Genesis then, by definition, the facts ‘are misunderstood’ or being intentionally manipulated.” (The Academic Nut)

Friday, January 29, 2010

Religious ads

There seems to be quite a stir about a religious anti-abortion ad airing at a sporting event called the “Super Bowl” (which has nothing to do about bowling, sadly). I don’t mind ads of that kind, even though I disagree with the message. What I do object to is that while polarizing religious ads are allowed to air, inclusive religious ads like the ones produced by the United Church of Christ are rejected:

UCC Ad - God is still speaking (Bouncer)


Now who could object to that?

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Hollowing a book - suggestions

Last night I got locked out of my own room. I stepped out of the master’s bedroom to get a book from my shelf when my hyperactive son (he’s three) slammed and locked the door behind me. My wife’s out (working late) and my spare key was in my wallet, inside the room! Well, my son panicked a bit since he’s having a hard time unlocking the door (it’s a bit stiff), so I had to talk him into slowly turning the lock knob counter-clockwise.

Because of this little episode, I decided to have another set of readily keys available during minor emergencies. Since my son already knows all the nooks and crannies in the house where I can hide the keys, I decided to make a hollow book like they do in movies. According to this online guide, it has to be hardbound and preferably thick. Also, it should not stand out from the other books in my bookshelf (a Tami Hoag hardback would look out of place in my shelf). So I looked at my shelf for a good candidate, and here’s what I found:

Thick hardbacks

From the bottom up: a) Asimov’s Guide to the Bible, b) Christian Theology, c) The New Oxford Annotated Bible 2nd Ed., and d) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

I’ll probably not choose Asimov’s book. It’s out of print and a bit hard to find locally. So that leaves me with three. Of the three, I haven’t read the Harry Potter one, so that’s off the list as well. Which leaves me with two choices: the bible or Erickson’s theology book. It’s kind of hard since they’re both great references. I use the annotations in the NOAB whenever I read a bible passage, and Erickson when I want to find out a typical evangelical position on a certain doctrine.

Maybe I should nick a Gideon bible when I stay at a hotel next time, and use that instead? Or if anyone out there would send me a thick hardback, I would really appreciate it. It’s for a good cause. :-)

Friday, January 22, 2010

Philippine Bible Week

 

It’s next week (January 25-31), and various churches and organizations are setting up special events to mark the occasion.

A local bible translation organization affiliated with SIL International will be having an “open house” where they’ll be showcasing their efforts to translate the bible in our local languages. Sounds interesting, I think I’ll go visit. Here are the particulars:

#3 Don Diosdado St., Don Enrique Hts., Quezon City

January 25-29, from 13:00 to 19:00

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Throwing down the gauntlet

Via AberrationBlog:
I would like someone, anyone, to provide me in the comments section where The Message Bible, the Today’s New International Version (TNIV), the New International Version (NIV), the New Living Translation (NLT) or even the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), or any modern translation contains the following…
  • New Age teaching
  • Feminization of men
  • Feminization of God
  • Feminization of Jesus
  • Feminization of the Gospel
  • The Devil’s footprints (whatever that is!)
I’m sure I could find one or two (or even none!) if I was so inclined, but since I’m no advocate of complementarian bible translations, I’ll leave it to the fundies.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Whoops!

“You might be United Methodist if your Bible still has the cellophane wrapper on it!” (source)

The joke is true! Today the liturgist was leading the lectionary reading, and for 1 Corinthians 12:1-11 she read 2 Corinthians 12:1-11 instead! And no one else in the congregation seemed to notice the goof (I was sitting in the last pew so I had a good view of the others).

At least the pew bibles are as neat and clean as the day my mother donated them to the church. :p

Friday, January 15, 2010

Help Haiti



The hands that help are better far
Than lips that pray
- Robert Ingersoll

We've seen the news. We've heard idiotic comments. Now's the time to act.

Monday, January 11, 2010

The danger of abandoning old blogs



Bishop’s old blog site now shows racy ad

From containing religious views, a Philippine Catholic bishop’s old Web log (blog) site is now featuring ads seeking “webcam models" and invitations searching "adult friends."

Visitors to Cagayan de Oro Archbishop Antonio Ledesma’s old blog site were greeted with the racy ads, along with links to supposedly "popular" sites to visit.

On the left side was an ad for AdultFriendFinder, which described itself as the “world’s largest adult social network and sex personals."

“Meet sexy singles ... join for free!" the AdultFriendFinder ad said.

Or maybe the good bishop really vouches for the services of that social network...

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Icon worship

video

Every year on January 9th, millions of Catholic devotees converge in the city of Manila to take part in the procession of the Black Nazarene. Most of the devotees believe that the sacred icon has magical powers, which can be harvested by wiping it with a handkerchief (or any other convenient piece of cloth). Also pulling the rope that leads the icon's carriage is said to bring good luck.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Oh, How the Mighty have Fallen!

Pastor Jim West, the big dog of bible blogging, has decided to quit blogging according to Scott. This comes after Jim was engaged in a blog war with John Loftus. Although I don't read Jim's blog anymore (after one too many uncharitable atheist-bashing posts), it's still a bit sad to see him go. Love him or hate him, he's the go-to guy for all things biblioblogging. At least we'll now have a new #1 biblioblog (JL Watts, most likely) but it won't be the same.

Let's just wait and see if Jim's blog will rise from the dead (after three days, for theological effect!). In the meantime, we can always read the 300+ other biblioblogs that aren't #1.

Friday, January 1, 2010

New year, new meme

James McGrath has a new meme for all of us who are not #1 in the biblioblog top 100 or something. The mechanics is simple. Find a search term where you will get a #1 listing in google search. But the search term must not use "quotation marks", and it shouldn't include your name (or pseudonym) or the blog name.

My #1 search term is... consuming christ, which links to my blog entry of the same name. It seems my innocent act of host desecration consumption is top choice for that search engine (and only that search engine). Whoopie!



Related Posts with Thumbnails